September 25th, 2016

Bid to halt Redditch plans put to vote at full council meeting

Bid to halt Redditch plans put to vote at full council meeting Bid to halt Redditch plans put to vote at full council meeting
Updated: 4:02 pm, Jul 26, 2016

REDDITCH Conservatives went on the offensive at Tuesday night’s full council meeting, the last before the summer recess.

At the heart of their attack was the highly controversial plan for the future expansion of the borough for the next 15 years.

That plan ‘Local Plan 4’ envisages some 3,000 new homes within the boundaries of Redditch plus an additional 3,400 at Brockhill and Webheath up to Bentley in Bromsgrove district.

However last week local Tory MP Karen Lumley lodged a ‘Notice to Hold’ the plan with the Department of Communities and Local Government. This would involve civil servants re-examining it with the potential of the Secretary of State, Bromsgrove MP Sajid Javid, who has himself written objecting to the plan, putting a stop to it.

On the table before councillors was a recommendation that they push ahead with an eight week consultation programme on the main modifications to the plan, starting on Wednesday, July 27 and running until Wednesday, September 21.

But what if Mrs Lumley was successful in her efforts to get the plan stopped – surely this consultation exercise would represent a huge waste of council taxpayers money? asked Coun Juliet Brunner (M’boro), leader of the council’s Conservative group.

Instead she proposed an amendment delaying consultation until after the Notice to Hold issue had been resolved.

“Your local plan is flawed and we cannot support it,” she said.

If it was a trap it was a cunning one, as Tory councillors lined up to take potshots at the plan, Coun Bush (Con, West) spoke for many when he said: “The houses will be on the wrong side of town from the employment areas. There will be gridlock.

“All our schools are on the one side too – we’ll be building homes as far away as possible and parents will end up transporting their children across town. This plan just isn’t sound.”

Labour seemed non-plussed, first questioning what exactly ‘Notice to Hold’ actually meant, before denying ownership of the plan, saying the main modifications were the planning inspector’s and not theirs.

Put to the vote the amendment fell 14-13, Coun Paul Swansborough (Ukip, Winyates) voting with the Tories.

Labour will now be hoping the Notice to Hold fails so they won’t have to go through the entire process again.

Comments